Automobile Accident Litigation Overturning the Unfavorable Police Report

Introduction: The Police Report is against your client. Now what? Over the last sixteen years of practicing personal injury and automobile accident law, it has been our experience that the quality of traffic accident investigations has steadily declined, leaving many injured people further harmed by a poor or incomplete police report. The reasons are as follows: government budget issues, poor police officer training, and a lack of commitment to performing a complete accident investigation. Certain well meaning police officers are just not qualified to investigate a complicated catastrophic car, truck or pedestrian injury or death case.

If the police report is against your client an insurance adjuster may not want to make a reasonable settlement offer. As a result the case may be difficult to resolve in a positive way for an injured client. A lawsuit may need to be filed and depositions of the witnesses, drivers, and investigating police officers taken to rebut the police report's conclusion. If the facts can be developed, it is the attorney's job to show the insurance adjuster, a judge or jury that the police officer got it wrong.

As we unpack the issues involved in overturning the unfavorable police report we will be discussing the following topics:

A. What is a Traffic Collision Report?

B. Who Has Standing to Obtain a Copy of the Traffic Collision Report?

C. Is the Primary Reporting Officer's Opinion Admissible at Trial?

D. Are the Witness Statements Within a Police Report Admissible at Trial?

E. Proving the Primary Reporting Officer's Opinion Is Wrong.

A. What is a Traffic Collision Report?

The Traffic Collision Report or CHP 555 is the standard reporting tool for most all police officer traffic investigators in California. It is intended to satisfy the basic data requirement needs of all users of traffic collision information.

The box on page 2 of the CHP 555 identifies the Primary Collision Factor. Primary Collision factor is defined by the CHP as; "PRIMARY COLLISION FACTOR. Select the one element or driving action which in the officer's opinion, best describes the primary or main cause of the collision. Whenever possible, this should be a Vehicle Code (VC) violation."

The term Other Associated Factor is defined by the CHP as; "OTHER ASSOCIATED FACTORS(S). When a secondary violation has been determined to have contributed to the collision, write the VC section in the appropriate box."

B. Who Has Standing to Obtain a Copy of the Traffic Collision Report?

Drivers involved in car accidents are required by statute to file reports with the California Highway Patrol or local police department, Vehicle Code section 20008. People with a "proper interest" can obtain copies of a police report, Vehicle Code section 20012.

The parties involved in the accident or any other persons having a "proper interest" may obtain copies of a police report. This includes persons involved in later accidents at the same location because the reports may disclose highway conditions causing or contributing to their own accident. See, California ex rel. Dept. of Transp. v. Sup.Ct. (Hall), 37 C3d at 855.

C. Is the Primary Reporting Officer's Opinion Admissible at Trial?

There are two distinctions regarding admissibility. First is the admissibility of the report itself. The second issue is the admissibility of an officer's ultimate opinion or conclusion. These are both separate and distinct evidentiary issues.

California Vehicle Code section 20013 states, "No such accident report shall be used as evidence in any trial, civil or criminal, arising out of an accident. The rule against admitting police reports into evidence is well established, Fernandez v. Di Salvo Appliance Co, 179 Cal App 2d 240; Summers v. Burdick 191 Cal App 2d 464 at 470. The policy behind Vehicle Code section 20013 is to protect against the danger of the jury giving more weight to the police report's conclusion simply because of its "official" character. There is a danger that the "official" police report alone may be relied upon to determine the verdict. As a result the contents of a traffic collision report should be excluded. Sherrell v. Kelso 116 Cal App 3d Supp 22 at 31.

However a police officer witness disclosed in conformity with a California Evidence Code section 2034 demand, who also qualifies as an expert witness, with sufficient experience and training, may give an opinion on the factors involved in causing an accident. Hart v. Wielt 4 Cal App 3d 224. In Hart a 13 year veteran of the California Highway Patrol, with extensive training and schooling in accident investigation was allowed to given an opinion on the proper speed given the conditions. The case involved a vehicle which slid out of control while maneuvering a sharp curve on State Highway 32 going towards Chester. Before the officer gave his opinion on speed the trial judge admonished the Jury that it was up to them to make the final determination of a proper speed and also whether or not the CHP officer was qualified as an expert witness.

In the case of Kastner v. Los Angeles Metro. Transit Auth 63 Cal 2d 52, a police officer deemed qualified by reason of his special knowledge, training and experience was allowed to give an opinion on the point of impact between a bus and a pedestrian. The opinion was based almost entirely on a statement given to the officer by the defendant bus driver at the scene. The bus driver testified at trial identical to the statement given to the police officer at the scene. This removed any argument that the officer's opinion was based on inadmissible hearsay. The Supreme Court in Kastner acknowledged that the trial judge must first determine whether or not the jury is aided by the expert opinion or if the question is within the common experience of an ordinary person, hence and expert's opinion would not be necessary, see Kastner at page 57.

In summary, the hard copy of the police report itself stays out of evidence. However if the foundation is present for an expert opinion from the police officer, the ultimate opinion in some form may find its way into evidence. But first the offering party must establish the subject of the opinion is sufficiently beyond common experience, the police officer has the appropriate qualifications, and the opinion is based on reliable evidence, see California Evidence Code sections 720 and 801.

D. Are the Witness Statements Within a Police Report Admissible at Trial?


Home Education Contacts: admin@sweetnovember.net 8 Advantages Of Online Driving Schools Advantages And Disadvantages Of Government Alto Music Best Guitar Shop Atlanta Motor Speedway Driving Schools Cooking Class The Perfect Gift For Any Austin Driving Intoxication Course Why Not All Driving Feel The Mirth Of Natural Getting Cheap Auto Insurance In South Government Grants And Scholarships For Students Government Purchasing Laws Homes In Hudson Valley At An Ideal How Government Jobs Could How The Government Can Assist How We Find Best And Top Schools How We Find Best And Top Schools Hudson Jeans For A Perfect Hudson Jeans Probably The Best Hudson Rodriguez Dating Hudson Valley Wine Trail And Neighboring Importance Of Air Purifiers Importance Of Government Jobs Its A Miracle a Plane Jennifer Hudson Family Funeral Update Kate Hudson Changes Views And Is Now Considering La Jolla Schools Unique Libraries Vanishing In Michigan Schools Limestone Mining Within Communities Of South Michael Kors Hudson Downtown Models On The Government Motorcycle Sturgis Bike Rally In South Online Government Auctions Payroll South Dakota Unique Places To Meet Singles In South Quality Among Driving Schools Richard Hudson Takes The Helm At Dynamic Sioux Falls Chiropractors Leading Health Professionals South Dakota Pheasant Hunting Taliban Infiltrates South Dakota Legislature The Benefits Of Graduating The Most Common Types Tips To Government Bidding Try Out Hudson Jeans And Get Used Weight Loss Surgery In South 4 Key Qualities of the Best A Proud Member Of The Key Stone A Tough Time for The Coalition Asset Protection How to Get it Right Automobile Accident Litigation Overturning the Unfavorable Can Randy Couture Defeat Mirko Canadas Beautiful Fraser Valley A Buyers Coalition For Deadbeat Dads Coalition Success in Any Language Coalition of Religious Communities Dealing With Interrogation Good Democratic Policing Management and Organizational Issues Essential Facts About Modern Street Fear and Greed Film Tax Credit Financing in Canada Good Cop Bad Cop Good Cop Bad Cop Interrogation Governance and Structure of Home Higher Education and Society Higher Stakes How Street Furniture Is Built to Last How to Ride Your Bicycle Safely Importance of Warning Street Signs Iraq Coalition Keep Cop Removal Marketing and Privacy Law What You Need Mirko Cro Cop Filipovic Who Can Stop Mommy Coalitions A Mothers Playing Cops and Robbers How to Host Police Brutality Police Costumes That Can Stop Traffic Police Written Exam How To Think Politics of Coalition and Contradictions Privacy Issues in Real Estate Rebranding The Nigerian Police Sexy Cop Costumes Stylish Shrinking Coalition Street Fight Quick Technique Street Fight Surprise Street Fighting One Way To Make The Coalition For Better Student The Components of the Perfect The Municipal Budgets II Roleplayers Documentation Tips for Finding States Travel Warnings and Coalitions Used Police Cars What Are the Qualities What is Neighbourhood Policing What to Do When Your Employer Who in the Police State Gets	Automobile Accident Litigation Overturning the Unfavorable Police Report Introduction: The Police Report is against your client. Now what? Over the last sixteen years of practicing personal injury and automobile accident law, it has been our experience that the quality of traffic accident investigations has steadily declined, leaving many injured people further harmed by a poor or incomplete police report. The reasons are as follows: government budget issues, poor police officer training, and a lack of commitment to performing a complete accident investigation. Certain well meaning police officers are just not qualified to investigate a complicated catastrophic car, truck or pedestrian injury or death case. If the police report is against your client an insurance adjuster may not want to make a reasonable settlement offer. As a result the case may be difficult to resolve in a positive way for an injured client. A lawsuit may need to be filed and depositions of the witnesses, drivers, and investigating police officers taken to rebut the police report's conclusion. If the facts can be developed, it is the attorney's job to show the insurance adjuster, a judge or jury that the police officer got it wrong. As we unpack the issues involved in overturning the unfavorable police report we will be discussing the following topics: A. What is a Traffic Collision Report? B. Who Has Standing to Obtain a Copy of the Traffic Collision Report? C. Is the Primary Reporting Officer's Opinion Admissible at Trial? D. Are the Witness Statements Within a Police Report Admissible at Trial? E. Proving the Primary Reporting Officer's Opinion Is Wrong. A. What is a Traffic Collision Report? The Traffic Collision Report or CHP 555 is the standard reporting tool for most all police officer traffic investigators in California. It is intended to satisfy the basic data requirement needs of all users of traffic collision information. The box on page 2 of the CHP 555 identifies the Primary Collision Factor. Primary Collision factor is defined by the CHP as; "PRIMARY COLLISION FACTOR. Select the one element or driving action which in the officer's opinion, best describes the primary or main cause of the collision. Whenever possible, this should be a Vehicle Code (VC) violation." The term Other Associated Factor is defined by the CHP as; "OTHER ASSOCIATED FACTORS(S). When a secondary violation has been determined to have contributed to the collision, write the VC section in the appropriate box." B. Who Has Standing to Obtain a Copy of the Traffic Collision Report? Drivers involved in car accidents are required by statute to file reports with the California Highway Patrol or local police department, Vehicle Code section 20008. People with a "proper interest" can obtain copies of a police report, Vehicle Code section 20012. The parties involved in the accident or any other persons having a "proper interest" may obtain copies of a police report. This includes persons involved in later accidents at the same location because the reports may disclose highway conditions causing or contributing to their own accident. See, California ex rel. Dept. of Transp. v. Sup.Ct. (Hall), 37 C3d at 855. C. Is the Primary Reporting Officer's Opinion Admissible at Trial? There are two distinctions regarding admissibility. First is the admissibility of the report itself. The second issue is the admissibility of an officer's ultimate opinion or conclusion. These are both separate and distinct evidentiary issues. California Vehicle Code section 20013 states, "No such accident report shall be used as evidence in any trial, civil or criminal, arising out of an accident. The rule against admitting police reports into evidence is well established, Fernandez v. Di Salvo Appliance Co, 179 Cal App 2d 240; Summers v. Burdick 191 Cal App 2d 464 at 470. The policy behind Vehicle Code section 20013 is to protect against the danger of the jury giving more weight to the police report's conclusion simply because of its "official" character. There is a danger that the "official" police report alone may be relied upon to determine the verdict. As a result the contents of a traffic collision report should be excluded. Sherrell v. Kelso 116 Cal App 3d Supp 22 at 31. However a police officer witness disclosed in conformity with a California Evidence Code section 2034 demand, who also qualifies as an expert witness, with sufficient experience and training, may give an opinion on the factors involved in causing an accident. Hart v. Wielt 4 Cal App 3d 224. In Hart a 13 year veteran of the California Highway Patrol, with extensive training and schooling in accident investigation was allowed to given an opinion on the proper speed given the conditions. The case involved a vehicle which slid out of control while maneuvering a sharp curve on State Highway 32 going towards Chester. Before the officer gave his opinion on speed the trial judge admonished the Jury that it was up to them to make the final determination of a proper speed and also whether or not the CHP officer was qualified as an expert witness. In the case of Kastner v. Los Angeles Metro. Transit Auth 63 Cal 2d 52, a police officer deemed qualified by reason of his special knowledge, training and experience was allowed to give an opinion on the point of impact between a bus and a pedestrian. The opinion was based almost entirely on a statement given to the officer by the defendant bus driver at the scene. The bus driver testified at trial identical to the statement given to the police officer at the scene. This removed any argument that the officer's opinion was based on inadmissible hearsay. The Supreme Court in Kastner acknowledged that the trial judge must first determine whether or not the jury is aided by the expert opinion or if the question is within the common experience of an ordinary person, hence and expert's opinion would not be necessary, see Kastner at page 57. In summary, the hard copy of the police report itself stays out of evidence. However if the foundation is present for an expert opinion from the police officer, the ultimate opinion in some form may find its way into evidence. But first the offering party must establish the subject of the opinion is sufficiently beyond common experience, the police officer has the appropriate qualifications, and the opinion is based on reliable evidence, see California Evidence Code sections 720 and 801. D. Are the Witness Statements Within a Police Report Admissible at Trial?
All rights reserved Copyright © 2013 Safe Streets Coalition Contacts: admin@sweetnovember.net